Skip to main content

determining the difference between what evaluative and assessment information is provided by an Internet search using a search engine (such as Google.com) and a search using a library subscription database of professional and juried articles

Nearly everyone has done an Internet search, but what clues are provided about the results of a search? In Written Assignment 2, you will focus on determining the difference between what evaluative and assessment information is provided by an Internet search using a search engine (such as Google.com) and a search using a library subscription database of professional and juried articles. To begin work on the activity, follow the steps outlined below.
Use your favorite search engine to look for Internet sources on privacy and security on the Internet.
Use EBSCOhost's Academic Search Premier database to do a Basic Search for articles on privacy and security on the Internet. (Log into the myEdison portal and locate the My Resources box in the center of the screen. The link to EBSCOhost can be found under the Educational tab.)
Including the evaluative criteria described in the assigned reading for Module 2 (see "Evaluating Web Pages:
Questions to Consider" http://guides.library.cornell.edu/evaluating_Web_pages) and "Web Evaluation Criteria"
http://lib.nmsu.edu/depts/reference/documents/WebEvaluationCriteria.pdf), write a 500-word essay describing your assessment of the accuracy, authority, objectivity, and currency you found in each of your search results. Focus on why search engines and databases produce different types of results; explain why there are differences in the results you obtained from each of the two types of search tools
Click Here For More Details on How to Work on this Paper......
Need a Professional Writer to Work on this Paper? Click Here and Get this Essay Done ………

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Logistic Regression Analysis

Logistic Regression Analysis Lacourse, Claes, and Villeneuve (2001) carried out a study to see whether a love of heavy metal could predict suicide risk. Eric Lacourse and his colleagues used questionnaires to measure several variables: suicide risk (yes or no), marital status of parents (together or divorced/separated), the extent to which the person’s mother and father were neglectful, self-estrangement/powerlessness (adolescents who have negative self-perceptions, are bored with life, etc.), social isolation (feelings of a lack of support), normlessness (beliefs that socially disapproved behaviors can be used to achieve certain goals), meaninglessness (doubting that school is relevant to gain employment) and drug use. In addition, the authors measured liking of heavy metal; they included the sub-genres of classic (Black Sabbath, Iron Maiden), thrash metal (Slayer, Metallica), death/black metal (Obituary, Burzum) and gothic (Marilyn Manson). As well as liking, they measured behaviora...
Post a Comment
Read more

Using Excel, find the mean, standard deviation, and 5-number summary of this sample

The most frequently used measures of central tendency for quantitative data are the mean and the median. The following table shows civil service examination scores from 24 applicants to law enforcement jobs: 83        74        85        79 82        67        78        70 18        93        64        27 93        98        82        78 68        82        83        99 96        62        93        58 Using Excel, find the mean, standard deviation, and 5-number summary of this sample. Construct and paste a box plot depicting the 5-number summary. Does the dataset have outliers? If so, which one(s)? Would you prefer to use the mean o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Pros and Cons of 360-Degree Reviews

 Pros and Cons of 360-Degree Reviews PROS • The system is more comprehensive because feedback is gathered from multiple perspectives. • It may lessen bias and prejudice since feedback comes from more people, not one individual. • The feedback from peers and others may improve an employees’ self-development. CONS • The system is complex in combining all the responses. • The feedback can be intimidating and cause resentment if employees feel the respondents have “ganged up” on them. • There may be conflicting opinions, though they may all be accurate from the respective standpoints. • Raters must undergo some training. • Employees may collude or “game” the system by giving invalid evaluations to one another. • Raters may not feel accountable if their reviews are anonymous. Need a Professional Writer to Work on this Paper? Click Here and Get this Essay Done ………
Post a Comment
Read more